When deciding which method to use for the analysis of toxins, three factors are commonly taken into account: speed, accuracy, and cost. Other issues to consider are the type of mycotoxins being tested, if analyzing raw ingredients or complete feed, the presence of masked mycotoxins, and the accuracy of the results.
First, it is very important to remember that, regardless of the method used, the accuracy of results will depend heavily on the sample collection method. Any of the methods described below will detect the toxin content of the specific sample provided to it. So, gathering a representative sample is more important than the testing method selected.
The second is considering the issue of synergism between different mycotoxins. As awareness of synergistic mycotoxins continues to grow, the importance of tests capable of detecting several mycotoxins is proving valuable.
As the name suggests, when more than one mycotoxin is involved, even at low levels of contamination the two toxins will increase the damage to the animal. Normally, the test methods of choice when contemplating synergistic mycotoxins are high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC/MS). Though HPLC and LC/MS are the most accurate for this purpose, some rapid tests have also been commercially developed to detect more than one mycotoxin.
The third issue is masked mycotoxins. A masked mycotoxin is a mycotoxin where the plant, or sometimes an animal’s digestive system, modifies the toxin as a defense mechanism for itself. Once modified by a plant, it is hard for many tests to accurately measure the number of mycotoxins in a sample. The simplest solution for this is sample preparation. Through sample preparation, the mycotoxin is released from the masked form. By their nature, rapid tests normally do not include sample preparation so the method of choice concerning masked toxins is HPLC and LC/MS.
Familiar to many of us, lateral flow devices (LFD) were distributed world-wide for Covid-19 rapid tests. An inexpensive and quick test—results within 10–15 minutes—these devices work by applying the basics of chromatography to draw a solution over a medium that will then pass through a testing agent. As the solution is drawn through the medium, if the sample is positive it will activate with the antigen located in the testing line; triggering the line to appear and indicate a positive result.
The limitation of this test is that it is a yes/no test with no numeric evaluation provided and it rarely can test for more than one type of toxin—so multiple tests need to be performed for each suspected toxin.
ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) testing is used to detect aflatoxins, T2 toxin, DON, HT-2, zearalenone, and fumonisins, among others. t is a simple, rapid, and cost-effective technique that allows for the detection of specific mycotoxins in a variety of sample types including raw materials, finished feed, and animal tissues.
ELISA tests work by using specific antibodies that are coated onto a microtiter plate. These antibodies will bind specifically to the target mycotoxin if it is present in the sample. After washing away any unbound material, a second set of antibodies is added which are linked to an enzyme. This enzyme will produce a signal if it binds to the previously bound mycotoxin-antibody complex. The signal is then detected by adding a substrate that will produce a color change or fluorescence that can be measured by a plate reader.
One of the main advantages of ELISA testing is that it is easy to perform, and does not require specialized equipment or trained personnel. It is also a very sensitive method, capable of detecting very low levels of mycotoxins in a sample.
However, ELISA is only capable of detecting specific mycotoxins and cannot detect a broad range of toxins simultaneously. Additionally, false positives or false negatives can occur due to cross-reactivity with other compounds or matrix interference, respectively. Therefore, ELISA testing should always be accompanied by proper sample collection and preparation to ensure accurate results.
High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is a widely used analytical technique for the detection and quantification of mycotoxins in agricultural samples. Capable of detecting a broad range of mycotoxins simultaneously, HPLC is used in laboratories worldwide and valued for its specificity (less chance of presenting false positives) and sensitivity (capable of detecting very low levels).
HPLC works by separating the different components in a sample based on their chemical properties. The sample is first extracted, then purified and concentrated before being injected into the HPLC system. The mycotoxins in the sample are then separated and detected based on their retention time and unique spectral properties.
One of the main advantages of HPLC testing is its ability to provide highly accurate and precise results, with detection limits as low as parts per billion. It can also be used to quantify multiple mycotoxins in a single sample, making it a useful tool for routine screening and monitoring programs.
However, HPLC is a time-consuming and expensive technique that requires specialized equipment and trained personnel. Overall, HPLC testing is an effective method for the detection and quantification of mycotoxins and is often used in conjunction with other analytical methods to ensure the safety and quality of food and feed products.
Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) is an advanced analytical method used to detect and quantify mycotoxins. It combines two powerful techniques, liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry, to provide highly specific and sensitive detection of a broad range of mycotoxins. Its ability to simultaneously analyzes hundreds of metabolites and mycotoxins is its strength.
Liquid chromatography separates the different components of a sample based on their chemical properties, while mass spectrometry identifies and quantifies the individual components by measuring their mass and charge. By combining these two techniques, LC-MS is able to accurately detect and quantify mycotoxins in complex matrices such as food and feed samples.
LC-MS is a highly accurate and reliable method for mycotoxin analysis, with the ability to detect very low levels of toxins. It also has the advantage of being able to detect a broad range of mycotoxins simultaneously, unlike other methods such as ELISA. However, it is a more complex and expensive technique that requires specialized equipment and trained personnel. Despite these limitations, LC-MS remains a valuable tool for the analysis of mycotoxins in agricultural products.
Near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy is considered to be a good replacement for more expensive and complex methods of analysis. NIR is a technique used for the analysis of various types of samples, including agricultural products. NIR spectroscopy is a non-destructive technique that is based on the interaction between the sample and the near-infrared radiation. The energy of the NIR radiation interacts with the sample and produces a spectrum that can be analyzed to identify the sample components.
NIR spectroscopy is a promising technique for the detection of mycotoxins in agricultural samples. It has been shown to be a reliable and fast method, with results comparable to other analytical methods. One of the main advantages of NIR spectroscopy is that it requires little to no sample preparation, making it a quick and cost-effective method.
However, one limitation of NIR spectroscopy for mycotoxin detection is that it is only able to detect certain mycotoxins, and not all of them. Additionally, NIR spectroscopy is affected by sample variability and matrix interference, which can lead to inaccurate results. Therefore, proper calibration and validation of the NIR instrument are essential to ensure accurate and reliable results.
If speed, cost, and results for common mycotoxins are the most important factors (e.g. quality control at the receiving dock) then the rapid tests (lateral flow test or Elisa) are chosen. On the other hand, if the objective is accuracy, detection of several mycotoxins, evaluation for non-traditional toxins, or the analysis of a complex matrix (complete feed ration) then the methods of choice should be HPLC, Mass Spectrophotometry (MS), or Liquid chromatography coupled with MS: LC/MS.
When analyzing for endotoxins, the question to ask is not ‘what method of testing to use’ but rather ‘what matrix to test.’ In the market, there are some rapid tests for endotoxin analysis. Unfortunately, these are not practical on the farm level since some sample preparation is always needed. HPLC and LC/MS can also be used but the problem is what to sample/test.
For mycotoxin analysis, it is clear that the material to be tested is either raw ingredients or complete feed. In some research cases, blood metabolites or body fluids (urine) or tissues (liver, kidney, ect.) can be analyzed for mycotoxin presence. However, endotoxins are not an issue in feed quality but occur in the animal.
Therefore, analysis of raw ingredients or complete feed is not a choice. Analyzing body fluids (blood, ruminal fluid) is done for research purposes, but it is costly, time-consuming, and requires technical expertise. Currently, there is no rapid analysis of endotoxins for the farm level. Even reference values for blood content have yet to be determined for the different animal production species.
Would you like to be kept informed of our latest developments? Register here and stay up to date.
"*" indicates required fields
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |